Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools
You are here: Home Climate and Energy Carbon Capture and Storage

Carbon Capture and Storage

Coal combustion for electricity generation produces carbon emissions. Currently, those emissions are released and trapped in the atmosphere. Advanced technologies can, however, capture the carbon before it is released, transport it via pipelines, and inject it underground for long-term storage. Before carbon capture and storage (CCS) can be applied on a large scale, policy needs to be developed to regulate pipeline and storage site location and clarify risk and liability.

Capture:

The Nicholas Institute is evaluating pre- and post-combustion capture technologies to determine remaining technological barriers and to develop up-to-date cost, performance, and availability assumptions.

We are using a modified version of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) from the Energy Information Administration to forecast which existing power plants will likely retrofit with post-combustion capture technology and where new CCS plants will likely be located. This modeling effort will provide the starting points for our pipeline routing analysis. We will also include existing industrial sites favorable for carbon capture.

    WORK IN PROGRESS:

  • Policy Brief: Barriers to Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plants
  • Geography of Carbon Capture and Storage Plants: A Forecast of Existing Plants likely to retrofit with CCS and of new CCS/IGCC plants (NEMS modeling)
  • Technology Evaluation: Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle

Storage:

We have developed a geologic model to estimate the feasible storage capacity and cost of all major geologic reservoirs in the United States. We are in the process of using this model to develop geographic-based carbon storage supply curves.

    WORK IN PROGRESS:

  • Geosequestration Supply Distribution for U.S. Sedimentary Basins

Pipeline Transport:

We are developing a geographic information system (GIS) model to determine optimal CO2 pipeline routes that will connect the plants we identify in our capture analysis discussed above with the best storage sites from our storage supply curve analysis.

We are also evaluating the existing legal and regulatory framework and how it may be applied to CO2 pipelines and storage. We will propose policies, if needed, to enable a pipeline and storage system.

    WORK IN PROGRESS:

  • Development and analysis of GIS pipeline network model

Synthesis:

Ultimately, we will combine our three analytical components to develop cost estimates for a feasible CO2 capture, pipeline, and storage system. We expect to be able to make recommendations for policymakers about where and how to focus public investment.

Document Actions

     

     

  • Send this
  • Print this
breaking down barriers to
environmental progress
News    Events    Students    The Climate Post    Email Updates    RSS Feeds    Contact Us
  Ways to Give    Initiatives at Duke   Interdisciplinary Studies    Webmaster