News

Legal Headaches Await Efforts to Ax Social Cost of Carbon ($)

Gutting a controversial method that federal agencies use to weigh climate change damages could come at a high legal price, analysts say. Under the Obama administration, agencies used a metric, known as the social cost of carbon, to estimate the hidden costs of carbon dioxide emissions. That is, they assigned a dollar value to asthma attacks exacerbated by poor air quality or damage wrought by rising seas. Billy Pizer, faculty fellow at the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions and Professor in the Sanford School of Public Policy, comments in ClimateWire.

Read Full Story

Exploring a New Mechanism to Cut Carbon Pollution in RGGI

On the Natural Resources Defense Council blog, Jackson Morris writes that the nine-state Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is one of the most successful climate programs ever created. In a webinar co-sponsored by the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Morris notes that he will help explore one of the ways we might make it even better, through creation of a new Emissions Containment Reserve (ECR). The basic idea: an ECR is a potential tool that could help us cut carbon pollution faster, at a lower cost. 

Read Full Story

Where will Clean Power Plan Organizers Refocus their Efforts? ($)

Think tanks and other groups around the country for the past few years have convened officials and run modeling looking at how states could comply with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan. As the fate of the Clean Power Plan remains uncertain under the Trump administration, those organizers turn their focus to the contemporary questions states face as they navigate a still-changing electricity system. In ClimateWire, Tim Profeta, director Duke University's Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, said the Nicholas Institute's work "on climate policy and clean energy extends beyond a single policy. Ultimately, power sector planning does not occur in four- or even eight-year increments."

Read Full Story

A Look at the Brodhead Legacy

A Duke Magazine story on President Richard Broadhead's legacy showcases a campus that's more nimble in conceiving its programs, more purposeful in connecting knowledge and practice, and more global in expanding its reach. It tells the tale of Brodhead’s expression “knowledge in service to society,” which is now a Duke catchphrase. But in Broadhead's view, it’s been long embedded in the DNA of Duke. “I was a little surprised to find that people thought my way of talking about it was new. But the reality was not my invention. You come to Duke and you see the Nicholas School together with the Nicholas Institute of Environmental Policy Solutions. You see biomedical research in an atmosphere that reaches into the worlds of practice, policy, and training."

Read Full Story

The Social Cost of Carbon

In an interview with Public Radio International’s Living On Earth, Nicholas Institute faculty fellow Billy Pizer discussed recommended changes in the social cost of carbon—the subject of a recent report he co-authored—and why social cost evaluations are crucial to tackling carbon pollution. Pizer noted that such evaluations have been used in more than 100 government cost-benefit analyses, most notably for the Clean Power Plan. Asked about energy department transition leader Thomas Pyle’s suggestion that the incoming Trump administration might consider lowering the social cost value or getting rid of it completely, Pizer said, “I think it would be problematic. I mean, generally when we do cost-benefit analysis, the goal of government policy should be to try to improve welfare for the American people and for people around the world, and there needs to be a way to do that mechanically, and the social cost of carbon is the way that you do that. It's not a Republican or Democratic idea. It's an economic idea.”

Read Full Story

Update on the Nicholas Institute’s Ocean and Coastal Policy Program

Ocean and Coastal Policy Program director John Virdin discusses core research focused on economic growth from the ocean, climate change mitigation, and fisheries and food security now underway for the Duke student publication, Upwelling.

Read Full Story

$500,000 USDA Grant Funds Study on Impacts of Using Oilfield Wastewater for Irrigation

Duke faculty have received a $500,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture to lead a multi-year project evaluating the potential human health impacts and sustainability of using produced water from oilfields to irrigate crops. The research will focus on the use of the wastewater on agricultural lands in California’s Central Valley.

Read Full Story

Report Recommends New Framework for Estimating the Social Cost of Carbon

To estimate the social cost of carbon dioxide for use in regulatory impact analyses, the federal government should use a new framework that would strengthen the scientific basis, provide greater transparency, and improve characterization of the uncertainties of the estimates, says a new report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report, which was put together by a committee that included Nicholas Institute faculty fellow Billy Pizer, also identifies a number of near- and longer-term improvements that should be made for calculating the social cost of carbon.

Read Full Story

Experts: If Clean Power Plan Perishes, GHG Regulation Almost Certain under NAAQS Program

If the Clean Power Plan is scrapped or weakened, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may be forced to regulate greenhouse gases (GHGs) emitted by existing power plants under its National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) program, reports PowerMag.com in an article detailing findings from a just-released working paper by Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions and the University of North Carolina’s Center for Climate, Energy, Environment & Economics. “If the ultimate decision is that the EPA either cannot regulate existing fossil fuel-fired power plants under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act or cannot include generation shifting when setting the rule’s stringency, then stakeholders may seek to use NAAQS,” said the paper’s authors. “Further, President-Elect Donald Trump has stated he would ‘scrap’ the Clean Power Plan. If he does, then stakeholders would likely sue, seeking to force the EPA to use the NAAQS program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

Read Full Story

Nicholas Institute Publishes Paper on CO2 Strategy ($)

Even if judges or his successor scrap President Barack Obama’s “Clean Power Plan” for curbing greenhouse gas emissions, federal law gives regulators and interest groups other ways to push the issue, a team that includes researchers from Duke University's Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions and UNC Chapel Hill said in a paper released today. The paper authors say that one likely channel is an expansion of the “ambient” air-quality standards that now target well-known pollutants like carbon monoxide, lead and ozone, the Durham Herald Sun reports.

Read Full Story

Pages