Southeastern states have varying participation in competitive wholesale power markets and/or utility-organized markets. Competitive wholesale markets are electricity markets operated by independent organizations active in the region. These include Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO), PJM, and Southwest Power Pool (SPP). The Southeast Energy Exchange Market (SEEM), a utility-organized platform created in 2022 for short-term bilateral power trading, is the region’s utility-organized market for electricity generation. Currently nine states in the SE (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi, Kentucky, Virginia) have utilities who participate in SEEM.
Using data from the Power Sector Competitiveness Dashboard, Nicholas Institute experts estimated Southeast participation rates in regional transmission organizations (RTO) or independent system operators (ISO) by customer counts. To our knowledge, before this analysis, publicly available visualizations of the Southeast depicted only geographical boundaries of these markets instead of quantitative customer participation. Drawing on EIA Form 861 and geographical data on electric retail service territories, we estimate state-level participation rates across the 12-state Southeast region.
The findings showcase the landscape of RTO/ISO versus non-RTO/ISO participation in the region.1 Southeastern states fall into three tiers:
- States with little to no organized market participation beyond SEEM (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee)
- States with moderate RTO participation (Kentucky and Mississippi)
- States with substantial RTO engagement (Arkansas, Louisiana, Virginia, and West Virginia).
Findings: These differences move beyond the perception of the Southeast as a homogenous non-RTO region and highlight the differing approaches Southeastern states have taken toward regional coordination and market structure. Six of twelve states in the Southeast have independent regional market participation that covers 48.9% or more of the state’s customers, with four states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Virginia, and West Virginia) above 90%.

SEEM-only, No RTO (0%)
Minimal RTO (0.1-24.9%)
- North Carolina (1.4% RTO)
- Tennessee (1.4% RTO)
Moderate to Majority RTO (25-71%)
- Mississippi (48.9% RTO)
- Kentucky (71% RTO)
Substantial RTO (≥90%)
- Louisiana (90.4% RTO)
- Arkansas (98.1% RTO)
- Virginia (99.5% RTO)
- West Virginia (100% RTO)
Definitions
Competitive Wholesale Market
- Independent System Operator (ISO): “An independent, federally regulated entity established to coordinate regional transmission in a non-discriminatory manner and ensure the safety and reliability of the electric system.” (Source: EIA)
- Regional Transmission Organization (RTO): “A voluntary organization of electric transmission owners, transmission users and other entities approved by the Commission to efficiently coordinate electric transmission planning (and expansion), operation and use on a regional (and interregional) basis. Operation of transmission facilities by the RTO must be performed on a non-discriminatory basis.” (Source: FERC)
Examples:
- PJM Interconnection (PJM)
- A regional transmission organization across the Mid-Atlantic and parts of the Midwest
- Southwest Power Pool (SPP)
- SPP covers the Great Plains and the Midcontinent and is in the process of expanding further to the Western US;
- Midwest Independent System Operator (MISO)
- MISO spans the Upper Midwest and parts of the Southern US
Utility-Organized Market
- Bilateral trading - "A direct contract between a seller and buyer outside of a centralized market or exchange. In energy markets, the buyer or seller usually finds his or her matching counter-party through a broker." (Source: FERC Glossary)
- Example: Southeastern Energy Market (SEEM)
- “The SEEM platform facilitates sub-hourly, bilateral trading, allowing participants to buy and sell power close to the time the energy is consumed, utilizing available unreserved transmission. Participation in SEEM is open to other entities that meet the appropriate requirements.” (Source: SEEM)
- Example: Southeastern Energy Market (SEEM)
Methodology
There has been a lack of easily accessible, open state-level customer count data available neither from these entities nor in aggregate, limiting the ability to conduct state-level assessments and evaluations (e.g., state-level savings per customer). Below, we briefly describe our methodological approach to estimate customer participation in regional markets.
Measuring Regional Market Participation: We used geographical data on electric retail service territories from Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to identify utilities located in each market (MISO, PJM, SPP) and combined it with U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) customer data to uncover wholesale market participation.2 These values are best approximations across multiple data sources as of December 2022, the release date of the latest publicly available ORNL data.
Because some utility territories cross state lines, it is difficult to cleanly separate which customers within a given state are served by RTO-participating utilities versus non-participating ones. While EIA Form 861 publishes state-level customer count data annually, the ORNL territorial data has not been updated since December 2022. This limits the ability to replicate RTO/ISO customer count estimates by state moving forward.
SEEM Participation: Evaluating SEEM is useful, as it represents a degree of regional coordination to facilitate energy transactions across the Southeast. However, because SEEM is organized at the utility level rather than the state level, trading volume data are likewise available at the same resolution, and detailed state-level participation data are limited. Additionally, SEEM's trading volumes only represent approximately 1% of total bilateral trading in the region (Tsoukalis et al. 2026). A granular, continuous measure of participation intensity would therefore convey little meaningful variation across states.
For these reasons, we use a binary indicator of SEEM involvement rather than a continuous measure of participation intensity. Readers seeking additional details on trading volume can assess SEEM’s annual reports (Potomac Economics 2025, SEEM n.d.).
Full methodological details are available in the Power Sector Competitiveness Dashboard Methodology: Market Participation (p. 23).
Geographical Coverage
Competitive Wholesale Market Geography
Map adapted from FERC, showing full national competitive wholesale market coverage. Inset box shows partial coverage of Southeast states by different RTOs.
SEEM Geography
See Southeast Energy Exchange Market for state- and utility-territory coverage across the region.
Suggested Citation
Parajon, E., and T. M. Gowdy. 2026. “Regional Market Participation Rates in the Southeast.” Durham, NC: Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment & Sustainability, Duke University. https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/project/southeast-power-sector-competitiveness-dashboard/regional-market-participation-rates-southeast/
The authors thank Ben Weintraut for outstanding research assistance.
Literature/Additional Information
| Explainers | Details |
|---|---|
| An Introductory Guide to Electricity Markets Regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
Overview of wholesale electricity markets regulated by FERC. |
| Electricity Markets 101 |
Overview of the different types of US electricity markets, how they are regulated, and implications for the future given ongoing changes in the electricity sector. |
- Information on this page is adapted in part from Encouraging or Impeding Power Sector Competitiveness: Utility Incentives and Regulatory Policies in the Southeastern US and Beyond Report.
- For West Virginia, we supplemented EIA utility customer count data, which showed 100% utility customer coverage, with additional review of PJM maps that also showed full coverage. This was a result of apparent gaps in EIA customer count data for the state.